I’m listening to my sister watch Disney’s Alice in Wonderland as I write, and I find it sad that animated features aren’t as highly regarded today as they used to be. You might smile, remembering people often saying that “Disney movies aren’t really for kids” – you’ll hear it mentioned in irony, or maybe gasped out loud in realization while re-watching an old favorite. We say it jokingly in fun, but the thing is it’s true. Walt Disney didn’t make films for children; Walt Disney made animated films.

It sounds so simple that we don’t really think about it much. Animated movies nowadays are usually labeled as “for kids” and the “real” live-action movies are for adults. Sometimes I suppose animated movies deserve that label. But marketing is really like a vicious cycle; the media and its consumers tend to feed off each other. So I could also argue that animated films today are targeted toward kids and families because most adults aren’t watching. It’s not exactly a dying art but at the same time, the art of animation is not quite the same.

Someone else could argue that animated films aren’t made intelligently anymore, that maybe if another Walt Disney came around (or someone at Disney knew what they were doing), then they would pay more attention. Add today’s technology into the mix and then you’ve got your old-school traditional animation lovers guffawing at even the thought of taking a modern animated film seriously. I mean let’s face it, unless it’s made by Pixar or an insanely popular DreamWorks movie (Shrek, *cough-cough*), mention an animated “cartoon” movie to an average single adult and their eyes start to glaze over.

If you appreciate cartooning and animation as an art form, then you’ve got a head start. Good for you. But unfortunately, we aren’t the majority. What’s also not the majority today is a really good animated film, and I mean really good. It’s rare that you find an animated film today as excellent and as esteemed as early animated films like Disney’s (the only ones I can maybe think of are by Pixar). Instead it’s much more likely you’ll hear that one was good, “for an animated movie” – and I bet you anything it’s out of the mouth of someone who took a kid to see it. Or you might hear that one was “funny”; but not usually because it’s a high caliber film.  

Those familiar with animation might say it’s because of traditional animation phasing out, that’s one thing that maybe has become a dying art. I’ve often griped about that myself. But I’m sitting here thinking that’s not really the issue here. The medium itself has changed in such a dramatic way. Whether that’s good or bad, I don’t know. Maybe it’s neither. Personally, like I said before, it makes me feel sad. But from a completely objective standpoint, it makes me wonder if there isn’t something more deep-seated going on here.

Don’t get me wrong, animation is still regarded as an art form – just not in the same way it used to be. Is this something to panic or lose sleep over? Probably not. But it’s definitely an interesting shift, to say the least.

What’s your opinion, are animated films less highly regarded today than they were originally – and is it for good reason?

 

Tanya Marcy is a writer and artist with a love for marketing, online media, and the independent arts. She blogs at stickTnotes, where you can find her story tips and tricks, and her ideas about being a creative artist in today’s changing world. Check out her own art at deviantART and sample her writing at Figment

Hi, I’m Tanya, and this is a Rant About How I was Creatively Squashed as a Kid

 

I was about to go into fourth grade when my best friend at the time told me her parents were switching her from the Montessori charter school we both attended over to a new Waldorf-inspired charter school. Being familiar with Waldorf, my mom was seriously considering moving me, too. I was confused. In my kid’s mind I kept thinking, why? We already go to a good school. My only motivation all throughout school has always been my peer group. So I was starting to think hey, why not go to this new school? My best friend’s going there. Maybe I should too.   

I don’t know if you know anything about Waldorf, but it’s actually a good philosophy. Waldorf focuses on creativity and child development based on the ideas of Rudolph Steiner. I got the impression that my best friend thought it would be easy because of this creative focus. (She wasn’t half-wrong. I think we only did actual math about once a year there. Okay, a couple times a year. But that was the school’s fault!) I convinced myself it would be alright. I loved the arts as a kid, and that school kind of got an artsy reputation during its run. Like I said, my main motivation in school has always been my friends. I love to learn, but structured education is just not my thing. So I figured if I had to go to school, an education with that creative nudge would be the way to go, right?

*Beep*, wrong!! I couldn’t have been more wrong. Now Waldorf in itself is pretty cool. Steiner had insight and made breakthroughs other forms of education and thinking hadn’t. It’s just that, this school didn’t know how to incorporate those theories into modern day culture. A lot of Steiner’s work had to do with understanding children and their perception of identity at different stages of development. So picture this: One of the rules of this Waldorf school was that we weren’t allowed to wear clothing sporting characters of any kind. Now picture me: a kid obsessed with Simba and Wishbone. (Yeah, I know. Fun, right? And you thought uniforms were a bad idea.) We also weren’t allowed technology. I remember watching in horror one time as our teacher tossed my peer’s Game Boy into the class trash can. And computers? Pft, forget them!

I had been putting on my own performance of The Lion King since I was seven and playing problem-solving computer games since the first grade. What the heck kind of creative world was this that I couldn’t be, you know, creative??

So was Steiner wrong? Nah, he was okay. Kids are highly impressionable, especially at the younger ages. It’s true that they’re prone to identify with whatever they surround themselves and what they absorb. Just like for ages kids have been playing with toy guns after watching western movies (or wherever it is people see guns as kids). What Steiner warned against was a loss of self; too much of anything, good or bad, and it could be detrimental to a child’s developmental health.  

But is every child the rule, or are some an exception? I wasn’t just identifying with characters as a kid, I was acting as them. I was writing about them. For other kids it might not have mattered as much, but for me…that was my vehicle for creative exploration and expression. I always felt like my creative power as a kid – something Rudolph Steiner actually stands for – had temporarily been taken away from me.

Which makes me wonder, how many of us artists – whether we’re visual artists, writers, authors, filmmakers, musicians – are still squashing our creativity ourselves?

 

Tanya Marcy is a writer and artist with a love for marketing, online media, and the independent arts. She blogs at stickTnotes, where you can find her story tips and tricks, and her ideas about being a creative artist in today’s changing world. Check out her own art at deviantART and sample her writing at Figment

For one day this past week, it seemed the entire Internet was abuzz with, not Obama and Romney politics but Disney buying LucasFilm (a.k.a. the Star Wars franchise). I’m not gonna lie, at first I was kind of peeved. If Disney buys ONE MORE thing I love and turns it into something else, I swear…. But then, after seeing excited reactions from everyone else and really thinking about it myself, I realized that it could be one of the best moves in entertainment history.

I may not agree with everything that Disney does, but you’ve got to admit, Disney is a smart company. Back when Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network were churning out creator-driven cartoons, Disney revamped its TV animation and brought it up to date with the times. Disney bought FOX Family and turned it into ABC Family – a network that’s just begun to take off in the last couple years with some really stellar programming. Disney let PIXAR create the films they wanted to create and as a result, have released some of the best computer-generated animated films out there. Disney found gold when they partnered with Hayao Miyazaki and other popular anime properties to release titles in the U.S. I could go on and on.

It’s time for a new generation of storytellers. It’s the start of November and NaNoWriMo, and I see young writers – writers who are GOOD – actively taking the torch we’re passing on and running with it. Now, I’m not saying I’m done writing, far from it. But I used to worry that if one day I woke up with no more stories to tell (ha, yeah right), there would be no one coming up after me to take the reins. Now I know the truth. There will always be somebody.

Disney buying LucasFilm is a good thing. It doesn’t mean the classic stories we once loved will disappear; it just means it’s time for a new band of storytellers to step up to the plate. Even if it means we replace 20th Century FOX high beams with a Walt Disney castle before the lights go down.

 

Tanya Marcy is a writer and artist with a love for marketing, online media, and the independent arts. She blogs at stickTnotes, where you can find her story tips and tricks, and her ideas about being a creative artist in today’s changing world. Check out her own art at deviantART and sample her writing at Figment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,319 other followers